Bringing transparency to federal inspections
Tag No.: A0131
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure family was notified of a change of condition for 1 of 3 (Patient #1) sampled patients.
The findings included:
1. Medical record review revealed Patient #1 arrived at Hospital #1's Emergency Department (ED) on 7/3/2021 around 11:04 PM via the police department. The patient was responding to internal stimuli, believed the year was 1992, threw a light at officers, and damaged neighbor's property.
The Medical Screening Exam (MSE) note dated 7/3/2021 at 11:05 PM revealed, " ...not being cooperative and is not answering any questions ...instructed me to get out of her face ..."
The physician orders dated 7/3/2021 at 11:05 PM revealed, "...Haldol [an anti-psychotic used to improve thinking and behavior] 5 mg [milligrams] IM [intramuscular]...Ativan [a benzodiazepine used to treat anxiety] 2 mg IM...Benadryl [an antihistamine] 50 mg IM X1 dose..."
The Standardized Intake Assessment form dated 7/3/2021 at 11:55 PM revealed, "...collateral (husband)...thought it was lack of sleep..."
The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) form dated 7/4/2021 at 1:40 AM, revealed Patient #1 was transferred to Hospital #2's ED with a diagnosis of "fall/hit head."
There was no documentation in the medical record the husband was informed when Patient #1 was transferred to a higher level of care.
2. In an interview in the conference room on 2/9/2022 at 2:51 PM, the Executive Director revealed the Intake Department medical staff made decisions on advising family members regarding patient status.
Tag No.: A0148
Based on policy review, record review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the patient received a copy of their medical record in a timely manner for 1 of 3 (Patient #1) sampled patients.
The findings included:
1. Review of the facility's "Patient's Bill of Rights" policy dated 2/2020 (11/2021), revealed an individual entering the facility for treatment was treated with dignity and respect. The patients have access to information in the medical record.
Review of the facility's "CONFIDTIALITY/ACCESS AND RELEASE OF PATIENT INFORMATION" policy dated 1/2019 (1/2022) revealed, "...PURPOSE...To preserve the patient's right to access his/her information...PROCEDURES...Post Discharge Release of Information (closed)...HIM [Health Information Management] is responsible for the release of all information post discharge..."
2. Medical record review revealed Patient #1 arrived at Hospital #1's Emergency Department (ED) on 7/3/2021 around 11:04 PM via the police department. The patient was responding to internal stimuli, believed the year was 1992, threw a light at officers, and damaged neighbor's property.
On 7/3/2021 at 11:05 PM, Patient #1 continued to be uncooperative during the admission process and was given medication.
On 7/4/2021 at 1:40 AM, the patient was transferred to Hospital #2's ED due a fall and returned to Hospital #1's ED at 7:40 AM.
Hospital #1 completed the Intake Assessment process and Patient #1 was discharged at 12:49 PM, with recommendations for outpatient treatment.
3. Review of a "AUTORIZATION FOR RELEASE OF PROTECTED HEALTH INFORMATION" dated 7/22/2021, revealed Patient #1 completed the form for the release of records from Hospital #1 for the dates 7/3/2021-7/4/2021.
Review of a "Request Exception Notification" form, from Hospital #1, undated revealed, "...We show no treatment at this facility for the dates of service you requested...We have been unable to locate a record for the above-named patient..."
4. In a telephone interview on 2/2/2022 at 1:05 PM, Reporting Source #1 verified they requested medical records from Hospital #1 and were informed they were never a patient.
In an interview in the conference room on 2/9/2022 at 2:51 PM, the Executive Director verified the "Request Exception Notification" came from the eDelivery system.