HospitalInspections.org

Bringing transparency to federal inspections

5841 SOUTH MARYLAND

CHICAGO, IL 60637

COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24

Tag No.: A2400

Based on document review and interview, it was determined for 2 of 22 clinical records reviewed, (Pt. #1 and #8) the Hospital failed to ensure compliance with 42 CFR 489.24.

Findings include:

1. The Hospital failed to provide a medical screening examination. Refer to tag A 2406.

2. The Hospital failed to ensure transfer requirements were completed prior to transfering a patient to receiving hospital. Refer to A 2409.

MEDICAL SCREENING EXAM

Tag No.: A2406

Based on document review and interview, it was determined that for 1(Pt #1) of 22 sampled patients who presented in the Emergency Department (ED), the Hospital failed to provide a medical screening examination (MSE).

Findings include:

1. The Medical Staff Bylaws (revised 2/2015) indicated "4.3 A. 14 b.The initial medical screening examinations for persons presenting in the Emergency Department may be performed by a physician member of the Medical Staff or House Staff or by a physician assistant, advanced practice nurse or any other qualified practitioner within his or her credentials... "

2. The policy entitled " Triage " (Revised 11/2015) indicated " Goals H ...Patient should be reassessed at appropriate intervals while waiting to be taken to the treatment area. Any significant symptoms should be reassessed for change and acuity category change as indicated. "

3. Pt #1 was a 28 year old male that arrived to the Emergency Department (ED) via ambulance on 2/23/16 at 5:57 PM for medical evaluation. Pt #1's chief compliant was diarrhea and back pain. Pt #1's vital signs were as follows: Temperature 98.4 Fahrenheit, pulse 93, espiration 18, blood pressure 106/78, pulse oximetry (oxygen level in the blood) 97% . A pain score of 10 (with 10 being the worst pain) was documented with the triage at 5:57 PM, and Pt #1 was moved to the waiting room.

Pt #1's ESI (Emergency Severity Index) score upon arrival was a 3 (urgent). After triage, it was changed to a score of 4 (non-urgent). Pt #1's clinical record indicated the Registered Nurse (E #4) was assigned to reassess patients while waiting for medical examination. E #4 called Pt #1 for a reassessment on two different occasions, 8:33 PM and 11:15 PM and documented "no response" from Pt #1. On 2/24/16 at 2:41 AM the Registered Nurse (E#5) documented Pt #1 left without being seen (LWBS).

4. On 3/2/16 at approximately at 10:00 AM the Registered Nurse (E #2) was interviewed. E #2 stated it was not clear based on documentation why Pt #1's acuity status changed from a level 3 (urgent) to a 4 (non-urgent) with abdominal pain level at a 10 (worst pain). E #2 stated based on the patient's clinical presentation, Pt #1 should have remained at level 3 after triage. E #2 further stated the triage nurse should have notified the physician of the patient's pain score of 10; and also have notified the assigned nurse, to perform reassessment of Pt #1's pain level, while waiting for medical evaluation.

5.. On 3/2/16 at approximately 1:00 PM the Medical Director of the Emergency Department (MD #1) was interviewed. MD #1 stated it is the expectation that every patient who that presents to the ED receives a Medical Screen Examination (MSE). MD #1 stated it is the physician's responsibility to identify and assess patients for any life threatening situation.

6.. On 3/2/16 at approximately 1:15 PM the Director of Emergency Services (E #3) was interviewed. E # 3 stated the triage nurse should have alerted the physician of Pt #1's pain level. E #3 stated the physician should have been alerted for patients who presented with pain level at 10 for them (physician) to evaluate the case.

APPROPRIATE TRANSFER

Tag No.: A2409

Based on document review and interview, it was determined that for 1 of 2 (Pt. #8), clinical records reviewed for transfers to another hospital, the Hospital failed to ensure an appropriate transfer.

Findings include:

1. On 3/1/16 at approximately 2:00 PM, the clinical record of Pt. #8 was reviewed. Pt. #8 was a 72 year old male who presented to the emergency department (ED) on 10/14/15 with a chief complaint of altered mental status change. The clinical record indicated Pt. #8 was transferred to another hospital on 10/14/15 at 6:20 PM. A nurse's note on 10/14/15 at 6:20 PM indicated, "(Ambulance) has arrived for pt (Pt #8), pt stable at this time for transfer."

2. On 3/2/16 at approximately 10:00 AM, the Director of Regulatory Compliance stated that Pt. #8's transfer form for 10/14/15 could not be located in Pt #8 chart. The Director presented a preprinted form entitled "Interfacility Patient Transfer Form" and stated this form is required to be completed when a patient is transferred. This form includes the following information: determination of stability, physician certification, patient consent, and the receiving physician of the other hospital.

3. On 3/2/16 at approximately 1:00 PM, the Director of Regulatory Compliance reviewed Pt #8's clinical record, and stated the required information was not in the record: acceptance of the receiving physician at the other Hospital, patient's consent to transfer or the physician certification that patient was stable to transfer.

4. On 3/2/16 at approximately 1:30 PM, an interview was conducted with the ED Medical Director (MD #1). MD #1 stated the expectation is prior to each patient that is transferred the transfer forms are completed and included in the patient's clinical record.