Bringing transparency to federal inspections
Tag No.: A0395
Based on interview and record review the hospital failed to ensure 1 of 1 (Patient #1) patients didn't acquire an in-hospital pressure injury.
Findings included:
A review of Patient 1's medical record reflected Patient #1 was admitted to the hospital on 8/24/17 without any pressure injuries. Patient #1 was discharged with an unstageable coccyx wound, and a stage II pressure injury on her buttocks on 9/06/17.
Nursing Notes. Date-8/24/17. Patient #1's initial nursing assessment indicated the patient did not have a "decubitus" ulcer (pressure injury).
Nursing Shift Assessment Head to Toe Notes.
Patient #1"s Braden Scale (An assessment tool commonly used to quantify a patient's degree of risk for developing a pressure ulcer. Each assessment parameter is measured on a scale from high risk of 1 to low risk of 3 or 4. The parameters include sensory perception, moisture, activity, mobility, nutrition, and friction and shear, with a possible total score range of 4 to 23. The lower the total score, the higher the risk for pressure ulcer development. Patients are at risk for developing pressure ulcers if the total score is less than 17).
8/24-26/17. Braden Scale-17.
8/27/17. Braden Scale-13.
8/28-31/17. Braden Scale-14.
9/01-06/17. Braden Scale-15.
Wound Assessment Notes
8/29/17. Wound #1. Coccyx wound. Unable to stage. Length was 3.5. Width was 2.6. Depth was 0.2. Slough was 10% and Eschar was 90%. Wound type was pressure.
Wound #2. Bilateral Buttock's wounds were abrasions. Length was 8.0. Width was 0.6. Depth was 0.1. Granulation 60%. Slough 40%.
9/05/17. Wound #1. Coccyx wound. Unable to stage. Length was 4.0. Width was 6.0. Depth was 0.1. Slough was 100%.
Wound #2. Bilateral Buttocks. Stage II. Width was 8.0. Width was 0.6. Depth was 0.1. Granulation was 20%. Slough was 80%.
During an interview with Personnel #3 and Personnel #4 on 11/01/18 at 1:45 PM they both reviewed Patient #1's medical record and confirmed they took part in the care of Patient #1. However, they didn't remember the patient. After a review of her medical record, they confirmed the patient was admitted without any pressure injuries, but was discharged with pressure injuries on her coccyx and buttocks.
Tag No.: A0396
Based on interview and record review the hospital failed to ensure 1 of 1 (Patient #1) patients had a care plan to address the patient's in-hospital acquired pressure injury.
Findings included:
A review of Patient 1's medical record reflected Patient #1 was admitted to the hospital on 8/24/17 without any pressure injuries. Patient #1 was discharged with an unstageable coccyx wound, and a stage II pressure injury on her buttocks on 9/06/17. There was no documentation of a plan of care for Patient 1's pressure injuries.
Nursing Notes. Date-8/24/17. Patient #1's initial nursing assessment indicated the patient did not have a "decubitus" ulcer (pressure injury).
Nursing Shift Assessment Head to Toe Notes.
Patient #1"s Braden Scale (An assessment tool commonly used to quantify a patient's degree of risk for developing a pressure ulcer. Each assessment parameter is measured on a scale from high risk of 1 to low risk of 3 or 4. The parameters include sensory perception, moisture, activity, mobility, nutrition, and friction and shear, with a possible total score range of 4 to 23. The lower the total score, the higher the risk for pressure ulcer development. Patients are at risk for developing pressure ulcers if the total score is less than 17).
8/24-26/17. Braden Scale-17.
8/27/17. Braden Scale-13.
8/28-31/17. Braden Scale-14.
9/01-06/17. Braden Scale-15.
Wound Assessment Notes
8/29/17. Wound #1. Coccyx wound. Unable to stage. Length was 3.5. Width was 2.6. Depth was 0.2. Slough was 10% and Eschar was 90%. Wound type was pressure.
Wound #2. Bilateral Buttock's wounds were abrasions. Length was 8.0. Width was 0.6. Depth was 0.1. Granulation 60%. Slough 40%.
9/05/17. Wound #1. Coccyx wound. Unable to stage. Length was 4.0. Width was 6.0. Depth was 0.1. Slough was 100%.
Wound #2. Bilateral Buttocks. Stage II. Width was 8.0. Width was 0.6. Depth was 0.1. Granulation was 20%. Slough was 80%.
During an interview with Personnel #2 on 11/01/18 at 2:30 PM she was asked to provide Patient #1's care plan for her pressure injuries. She said there wasn't one..