The information below comes from the statement of deficiencies compiled by health inspectors and provided to AHCJ by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. It does not include the steps the hospital plans to take to fix the problem, known as a plan of correction. For that information, you should contact the hospital, your state health department or CMS. Accessing the document may require you to file a Freedom of Information Request. Information on doing so is available here.
|MEMORIAL HERMANN HOSPITAL SYSTEM||1635 NORTH LOOP WEST HOUSTON, TX 77008||Feb. 22, 2012|
|VIOLATION: RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE||Tag No: A0395|
|**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY**
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate RN supervision and assessment of patient needs for 1 of 10 Emergency Department patients ( Patient ID # 1).
Emergency Department (ED) nursing staff failed to appropriately monitor and assess Patient ID #1's blood pressure based on the severity of his condition.
Intake # TX 754
Record review of Patient ID #1 ' s clinical record revealed he was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility ED via ambulance at on 12-14-2011 at 2:27 p.m. He was triaged at 2:28 p.m with a chief complaint documented as "Headache, Abdominal Pain, and ETOH Abuse."
Review of the ED physician assessment dated [DATE] revealed Patient ID # 1 was alert and oriented and his chief complaint was " fall. " In addition, it was documented the patient was complaining of nausea and vomiting. The " Clinical Impression " documented by the ED physician read: " 1. Hypertensive Emergency 2. Fall. 3. Intraventricular Hemorrhage. "
A CT Scan of the head was done on 12-14-11 at 4:30 p.m. that showed evidence of a stroke: " hemorrhage within the right basal ganglia with extension into the ventricular system ... " An additional CT of the head was done on 12-14-11 at 10: 42 p.m. that showed " small amount subarachnoid hemorrhage...stable CT as compared to earlier CT... "
Further review of Patient ID # 1 ' s clinical record for 12-14-11 revealed the following:
Traiage assessment at 2: 28 p.m.; blood pressure was 177/117.
An additional blood pressure measurement was not obtained until 2 hours and 33 minutes later at 5:01 p.m. At this time, Patient ID # 1 ' s blood pressure was documented as 196/117; he was medicated with Enalipril 1.25 milligrams (mg) Intravenous (IV) Push.
5:11 p.m. blood pressure documented as 179/106
6 :00 p.m: blood pressure documented as 170/107
7:17 p.m.:blood pressure was 206/143 . Patient ID # 1 was medicated with Labetalol 20 mg IV push; shortly thereafter, Patient ID # 1 ' s blood pressure was 157/101.
9:15 p.m: blood pressure was 187/ 114 ; Patient ID # 1 was medicated with Hydralizine 20 mg IV Push. Blood pressure was not re-assessed until 1 hour and 15 minutes later at 10:30 p.m., when it was 116/72.
Interview on 02-22-12 at 1:45 p.m. with the ED Director (ID # 59) she stated that Patient ID # 1 ' s admission blood pressure was " very high and it should have been monitored more frequently while he was in the ED."
Review of policy titled " Assessment Reassessment (Emergency Services), " review date 02-20-2011, revealed " " ...3.3 the frequency of reassessment is based on the patient ' s acuity, condition, history and complaint, or as directed by the physician; minimally every four (4) hours.