The information below comes from the statement of deficiencies compiled by health inspectors and provided to AHCJ by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. It does not include the steps the hospital plans to take to fix the problem, known as a plan of correction. For that information, you should contact the hospital, your state health department or CMS. Accessing the document may require you to file a Freedom of Information Request. Information on doing so is available here.
|FROEDTERT MEMORIAL LUTHERAN HOSPITAL||9200 W WISCONSIN AVE MILWAUKEE, WI 53226||Oct. 16, 2014|
|VIOLATION: ANESTHESIA RECORD||Tag No: A1003|
|Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to complete a pre-anesthesia evaluation prior to surgery for 3 of 10 patients (1, 2, 4) reviewed.
Pt. #1's MR review on 10/16/2014 at 11:45 a.m. revealed a surgery start time of 12:46 p.m. on 3/20/2014. Pre-anesthesia evaluation with physical exam is documented on 3/20/2014 at 2:58 p.m., after the start of surgery.
Pt. #2's MR review on 10/16/2014 at 1:25 p.m. revealed a surgery start time of 8:00 a.m. on 3/4/2014. Pre-anesthesia evaluation with physical exam is documented on 3/4/2014 at 8:18 a.m., after the start of surgery.
Pt. #4's MR review on 10/16/2014 at 1:32 p.m. revealed a surgery start time of 12:30 p.m. on 6/5/2014. Pre-anesthesia evaluation with physical exam is documented on 6/5/2014 at 1:19 p.m., after the start of surgery.
RN A confirmed these finding during medical record review. RN A stated during an interview on 10/16/2014 at 2:30 p.m. that the facility did not have a policy specific to documentation requirements related to anesthesia.
|VIOLATION: INPATIENT POST-ANESTHESIA EVALUATION||Tag No: A1004|
|Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate operative records for 1 of 10 patients (#1) reviewed.
Pt. #1 incurred injuries related to anesthesia emergence on 3/20/2014. Review of Pt. #1's MR on 10/16/2014 at 11:45 a.m. failed to include detail regarding any type of complication or adverse emergence from anesthesia.
During a phone interview with Res F on 10/16/2014 at 2:15 p.m., Res F stated that Res F was in the operating room during Pt. #1's surgery and was present as Pt. #1 "woke up" from anesthesia. Per Res F, Pt. #1 was "very combative" and "agitated" as Pt. #1 woke up from anesthesia. Res F stated that Pt. #1 attempted to "kick off" the table resulting in broken safety straps (used to restrain patients during surgery) and Res F lifted Pt. #1's leg back on to the table. Pt. #1 was the "most combative" patient that Res F had seen waking up from anesthesia. When asked about whether it is expected to document patients that are unusually combative upon waking from anesthesia, Res F stated "I don't know."
Review of operative notes failed to include Pt. #1's status upon waking from anesthesia. MD G dictated the final operative notes, MD G was not in the OR at the time of Pt. #1 waking from anesthesia per interview with Res F. Pt. #1's post-anesthesia documentation, written by Res D, states Pt. #1 had an "uneventful anesthesia course."
Res D stated during a phone interview on 10/16/2014 at 3:48 p.m. that Pt. #1's anesthesia course was standard, that there was nothing unusual about the Pt. #1's emergence from anesthesia and that Pt. #1 "definitely wasn't combative."
Based on an interview with MD C on 10/16/2014 at 11:15 a.m., MD C stated that the complications incurred by Pt. #1 are not uncommon. The complications suffered by Pt. #1 are routinely tracked as part of anesthesia quality assurance measures. MD C stated that documentation "could have been better" regarding Pt. #1's anesthesia course.
RN I stated during an interview on 10/16/2014 at 11:15 a.m. that it is "difficult to document combative emergence" in the OR due to limitations within the electronic health record.
During a phone interview with Res D on 10/16/2014 at 3:48 p.m., Res D stated that Res D administered 50 mcg of fentanyl to Pt. #1 prior to Pt. #1 moving from the pre-operative holding room into the OR. Review of Pt. #1's MR revealed that Pt. #1 received 75 mcg of fentanyl at 12:17 p.m., after the anesthesia start time of 12:11 p.m.
During an interview with MD C on 10/16/2014 at 3:30 p.m., MD C stated that pre-operative medications are documented on the intra-operative record as there is no other place within the electronic health record to document medications given pre-operatively. Per MD C, the facility does not have any policies that are specific to medication administration in the anesthesia department.
Facility policy "Medication Documentation" #C01.069 dated 6/25/2014, reviewed 10/16/2014 at 4:00 p.m., states in part "Documentation will be completed at the time of medication administration..."