The information below comes from the statement of deficiencies compiled by health inspectors and provided to AHCJ by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. It does not include the steps the hospital plans to take to fix the problem, known as a plan of correction. For that information, you should contact the hospital, your state health department or CMS. Accessing the document may require you to file a Freedom of Information Request. Information on doing so is available here.

WALTER P REUTHER PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL 30901 PALMER RD WESTLAND, MI March 8, 2012
VIOLATION: PATIENT RIGHTS: FREE FROM ABUSE/HARASSMENT Tag No: A0145
Based on interview and record review, 1 of 1 patients (#5) alleging peer abuse or harassment, experienced repeated episodes of abuse/harassment with no updates to the Individual Plan of Service (IPOS) and no documented response to some episodes, resulting in increased risk of patient abuse and harassment.

On 3/8/12 from approximately 1200 hours-1530 hours, patient #5's clinical record, Incident Reports and Recipient Rights Complaints were reviewed. No reports of patient abuse by staff were noted. Documentation of patient #5 being physically assaulted by a peer were noted on: 2/2/12, 2/3/12 and 2/28/12, resulting in facial contusions and a fall.

Recipient Rights Advisor (RRA) #1 provided copies of complaints filed by patient #5 on 1/12/12, alleging peer harassment, and on 2/1/12, alleging threats and intimidation by a peer. In a letter dated 1/12/12, RRA #2 advised patient #5 that being harassed by a peer was not a Code (Mental Health Code) protected right so there would be no investigation or intervention. In a letter dated 2/29/12, RRA #2 advised patient #5 that her complaint of being threatened and intimidated by a peer had been received on 2/1/12 and that RRA #2 contacted patient #5's therapist regarding the allegation on 2/21/12, 20 days after receiving the allegation. A Code protected right, to receive services in a safe, sanitary humane treatment environment, was noted for the latter allegation. On 3/8/12 from approximately 1345-1415 hours, these findings were verified with RRA #1. RRA #1 stated that protection from patient to patient harassment, alleged in the 1/12/12 complaint, is a Code protected right if the patient's sense of safety is compromised.

Patient #5's most recent IPOS (Individual Plan of Service) was dated 1/18/12. There were no goals or interventions related to peer conflicts, abuse or harassment. On 3/8/12 at approximately 1530 hours these findings were verified with the Director of Nursing.