HospitalInspections.org

.

Based on observation, the facility failed to provide an approved method to ensure appliances that are protected under the hood, if they are moved, they are returned to the approved design location per the requirements of:

2012 NFPA 101, 18.3.2.5.1, and 9.2.3
2011 NFPA 96, 12.1.2.2, 12.1.2.3, and 12.1.2.3.1

This deficiency affects 2 of 2 appliances.

Findings include:

During a tour of the facility, the surveyor observed that the facility failed to provide an approved method to ensure appliances that are protected under the hood, if they are moved, they are returned to the approved design location. The following appliances are affected:

1. The range

2. The deep fryer

A member of maintenance staff was present when this deficiency was identified.

.

.

Based on observation, the facility failed to maintain the full time magnetic locked egress doors per the requirements of:

2012 NFPA 101, 18.3.4.1, and 9.6.1.3
2010 NFPA 72, 21.9

This deficiency affects 5 of 5 full time magnetic locked egress doors.

Findings include:

During a tour of the facility, the surveyor observed all full time magnetic locked egress doors failed to automatically unlock upon loss of power to the fire alarm system.

A member of the maintenance staff was present when this deficiency was identified.

.

.

Based on observation, the facility failed to limit the movement of a gas fueled appliance with casters located under the kitchen hood, by a restraining device per the requirements of:

2012 NFPA 101, 18.5.1.1, and 9.1.1
2009 NFPA 54, 9.6.1.1, 9.6.1.2, and 10.12.6

This deficiency affects 1 of 1 kitchen appliance with casters.

Findings include:

During a tour of the facility, the surveyor observed that the facility failed to provide a restraining device for the gas fueled oven with casters.

A member of maintenance staff was present when this deficiency was identified.